Thursday, September 29, 2011

Did Dr. Eastwood Give Special Treatment to Student Athletes in Summer School?


  

The following is a transcript of an email sent to Mr. Estrada on September 26, 2011 at 11:09. The Board of Education, Teacher Union President, Ms. Esposito, and High School Principal, Mr. Gonzalez were copied.

Subject: Summer Hiring


From this email and Ken's earlier email, I gather that there may be some dissension in the ranks. What is this all about? I did hear an unconfirmed rumor that Ken hired a teacher for summer school to teach a non remedial math course to only four athletes. This type of course offering would be contrary to past practices. I gather that these graduated students needed this course in order to accept their athletic scholarships, and the students were given credit for this course even without completing the required weeks for summer school. Special treatment? Visions of Newburgh? Please confirm or deny this rumor.

To date, no reply has been given, and none is anticipated. As a point of fact, summer school is suppose to be only for remedial work,and class size is usually about 25 students. The public has the right to have the substance of this rumor confirmed or denied, and the right to know if special treatment was arranged for some students.

Dr. Nicholas A. Mauro

 

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Is Validation Study of the District's Academic Achievements Just Another Con?

At the September 1 meeting of the Middletown Board of Education, Dr. Eastwood had a paid consultant present his Validation Study on the district's academic accomplishments. According to the presenter, his study was based primarily on data and information derived from State testing. This article by Susan Edelman in The New York Post brings into question the value, credibility, and reliability of State educational testing, and the derived information about education provided to the public by the State. Since any study can only be as sound as the data and information from which it is derived, both the conclusions of the current Validation Study and academic accomplishments of Dr. Eastwood's administration become questionable. Please read the article and draw your own conclusions.